In two previous posts I have reviewed some New Zealand schools of thought on resilience – New Zealand Resilience Trust and Resilient Organisations. Today I am looking at some US thinking, the Centre For Resilience at Ohio State University. These guys cover a wide range of thinking in the area of resilience, from its early […]
… the meaning of resilience is vague
I have been accepted to speak at a BCI conference in the New Year, so I sent a rough outline of the session to a number of colleagues for comment. Despite the small sample I think it indicates that this concept of resilience is still unclear in many BC professionals’ minds. I asked these folks […]
… that final scene with HAL and Dave
If you recognised the reference to Kubrick’s “2001: A Space Odyssey”, well done. Stay with me and I will explain the relevance. I have been interested in the thoughts and writings of Nicholas Carr for some time – since reading his book Does IT Matter? and the related articles and debate that followed. I have […]
… the holy grail of resilience
It seems we have all been wasting our time! Following on from yesterday’s post about confusing the software and the tool (and if you want to follow some additional conversation on this issue it was picked up at Agile Continuity) I have discovered a company, called Enterra Solutions, that can sell you “Enterprise Resilience”. Their approach fuses Enterprise Risk Management, […]
… how often we mistake the tool for the process.
I have been catching up with my reading over the weekend, and came across a Risk Management related blog Riskczar. This post about risk management technology caught my attention and started me thinking. How many times do we see people mistake the tool for the process, especially in areas such as Risk and BC Management? […]
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- Next Page »