This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept

Resilience Ninja

Coaching and ideas to help build agile and resilient practices.

You are here: Home / Conferences / The final day

Jun 22 2011

The final day

Share
Share on Facebook
Tweet
Tweet this

The final day of WCDM 2012 started the same as the last two – with a scary doomsday keynote!

Today the subject was the risk of nuclear terrorism. John Powers suggested that some large cities – especially in the USA – are the most likely targets.

However a key message was for all to be ready to deal with the indirect impacts, as there is little scope to help those directly impacted.

Loss of critical infrastructure and the knock-on effects were areas to focus on. Powers also highlighted a need for ‘Continuity of Government’ and pre-vetted action plans.

Not that dissimilar to the lessons we need to apply to a lot of other incidents. Flooding disasters, like that in Pakistan, also teach us about incidents where the scale of the incident is really measured by the number of survivors impacted, rather than the death toll.

Also succession planning is a sound practice for normal BCM.

The second session, an approach for reducing ‘readiness’ to a set of metrics on a page, did little to allay my fears. It may do wonders for compliance and the illusion of control – but real capability is still a people issue.

The panel session (pictured) provided a change of pace with some interesting, and at times robust, exchange of views. A lot of the robust exchange was in relation to the idea of Public Private partnerships. The hot questions could be re-stated as;

  • Are these really partnerships?
  • Do the private sector and government have competing (and perhaps incompatible) objectives
    • Profit motive being the main culprit here

One of the many, often not perceived, cases where culture and our own world-view means that we cannot have meaningful discussions on the subject.

Also the issue of Sovereign Wealth Funds and the risk of allowing these entities to gain ownership/control of Critical Infrastructure in other countries arose.

  • Can they be expected to support the needs of the country they have invested in, when this might conflict with the need to feed the citizens of the home country.

The final session, about earthquake damage, while focussed on serious and disturbing subject, was well done and included some great photos taken by the presenter.

I will post a summary and reflection on the conference tomorrow.

In the interim I am heading to Washington, DC for the ISACA World Congress, would be great to catch up with anybody who is attending.

Share
Share on Facebook
Tweet
Tweet this

Written by Coach K · Categorized: Conferences · Tagged: WCDM 2010

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tags

Adaptability Agility Amy Lee AS/NZS 5050 BCAW BCI BCM BC Practice Charley Newnham Community Community Conferences Craft Craft Crisis Management Culture Cynefin Deepwater Horizon Disruption DRJ Frameworks Goals High Reliability ISACA Jan Husdal Learning Organisation LinkedIn Operational Risk Pandemic People Plans Practice Resilience Resilient Organisations Riskczar Risk Management Skills Standards Stone-Roads Supply Chain Risk Theory Tools/Technology Vulnerablity WCDM 2010 Weather

Search Form

Social Icons

  • Dribbble
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Post Categories

June 2025
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
« Jun    

© 2025 Resilience Ninja · Rainmaker Platform