This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept

Resilience Ninja

Coaching and ideas to help build agile and resilient practices.

You are here: Home / BC Practice / … uncertainty and resilience

Mar 25 2010

… uncertainty and resilience

This is my presentation (at least the slides part) from the BCI Summit in Sydney today.

When I have some time I may take up Jan Husdal’s suggestion to develop some form of webinar. I assume that was Jan getting me back for highlighting new research for him to review!

The key message is this – if we want to make our organisations resilient we need to do a couple of things;

  • First and foremost change our thinking.
    • Resilience is not something we already have with a different name
    • It is not rebranding BCM (or Risk)
    • It is more Art than Science
  • It is only relevant (and can only be given meaning) within the context of your organisation
BCI Summit Sydney 2010

View more presentations from Ken Simpson.

Happy to field virtual questions via the comments.

Written by Coach K · Categorized: BC Practice, Conferences, Resilience Thinking · Tagged: Adaptability, Agility, BC Practice, BCI, BCM, Conferences, High Reliability, Plans, Resilience, Standards, Theory, Vulnerablity

Comments

  1. Jan Husdal says

    March 26, 2010 at 11:22 PM

    Since I was mentioned in this post, I'd better comment on it, not? The webinar idea was simply to make the presentation more interesting, i.e. listen to you speak while watching the slides in real time. I really liked the 2nd last slide on Art and Science. I could not fully relate to the classifications used, but what the difference in what was in the boxes made perfect sense. Resilience is not about being rational, many times it is about being ir-rational, because the solution to the BC problem at hand is often not found in advance, but at the spur of the moment, improvised and contingent upon the situation. Anyway, great presentation.

    Reply
  2. Ken Simpson says

    March 30, 2010 at 10:26 PM

    Thanks Jan, the issue of more Art and less Science was really the key take away.

    The statements that went with that ran something like this – if you want to do something with resilience and make it work – then we need to change our thinking.

    Thus far we have moved from IT-oriented DR Planning, to BC Planning, to BC Management and the next big thing is people talking about resilience.

    Too many people simply took a pen, crossed out the job title on their business cards and wrote in the new one. They didnt change their thinking or what they did.

    Too many people are still doing IT DR and calling it resilience.

    Anyway, I started recording the audio last night and should have the presentation ready to go as a webcast after Easter.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tags

Adaptability Agility Amy Lee AS/NZS 5050 BCAW BCI BCM BC Practice Charley Newnham Community Community Conferences Craft Craft Crisis Management Culture Cynefin Deepwater Horizon Disruption DRJ Frameworks Goals High Reliability ISACA Jan Husdal Learning Organisation LinkedIn Operational Risk Pandemic People Plans Practice Resilience Resilient Organisations Riskczar Risk Management Skills Standards Stone-Roads Supply Chain Risk Theory Tools/Technology Vulnerablity WCDM 2010 Weather

Search Form

Social Icons

  • Dribbble
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Post Categories

May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jun    

© 2025 Resilience Ninja · Rainmaker Platform